Links and Resources

  • Coronavirus: Are Our Scientists Lying To Us?

  • Dr. Chris Martenson, Ph.D. Pathology, explains how improbable a select, lethal enhancing, SARS-2 gene sequence is to have arisen through natural evolution. Rather, the improbability is highly suggestive of some kind of high-tech monkey business. Specifically, this improbable sequence enhances human infectivity through the SARS-2 Spike Protein. When the human hand in a laboratory enhances viral infectivity, it is called a synthetic viral Gain of Function (GoF) augmentation. With irrefutable evidence, Dr. Martenson explains in detail just how unprecedented this gene sequence is that dramatically enhances human infectivity of the SARS-2 virus. Dr. Martenson highlights that this unprecedented bat coronavirus sequence (specifically the polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA - CCT CGG CGG GCA) is THE priority question for a true investigative reporter to ask any virologist or infectious disease specialist for a sensible, truthful, no-spin scientific explanation as to why this sequence could not indeed be a GoF SARS-2 Spike Protein augmentation. 

  • Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research

  • With crystal clarity, the preeminent virologist Yuri Deigin dives deeply into the SARS-2 molecular biology. He elegantly and thoroughly discusses how SARS-2 may very well be made by the human hand to intentionally bring about specific Gain-of-Function (GoF) augmentations that first (a) enables and then (b) enhances human infectivity of SARS-2. Unfortunately, over the decades there have been several synthesized or otherwise highly lethal viruses that have escaped their biocontainment laboratories. Therefore, it would be of paramount importance to outlaw such GoF experiments, since to date, ICRM is unaware of any true, practical benefits that have arisen from this specific line of experimentation. We invite comments in this regard by anyone who can actually prove past or current true practical benefits from GoF experiments. ICRM notes that in 2014, the Obama Administration became so concerned about coronavirus GoF experimentation that it cut off all funding to the very virologists and laboratory allegedly responsible for this SARS-2 pandemic, as recently asserted by a dossier authored by "Five Eyes" intelligence, a consortium of intelligence agencies from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (Eric Mack, Five Eyes Intelligence Memo Details China COVID-19 Cover-Up. NewsMax, Sunday, May 3, 2020 - www.newsmax.com). Unfortunately, under the supervision and responsibility of Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, NIAID Director under the National Institutes of Health, funding continued from 2015 forward despite this 2014 standing order to cease such GoF funding. Perhaps all the loud denials that ensued after the release of the Five Eyes dossier alleging that SARS-2 escaped containment in the Wuhan P4 Laboratory are made by (1) those potentially culpable, and/or (2) those who make a livelihood from GoF experimentation, or (3) those funded or otherwise under the controlling influence of the Chinese Communist Party, or (4) those in a closely aligned network with the laboratory and virologists of concern. 

  • Virus by Design: Was COVID-19 Created in a Lab? (w/ English Subtitles) - 2008 Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Luc Montagnier, discoverer of HIV virus

  • Dr. Montagnier, together with Dr. Jean-Claude Perez, have published a stunning, even earth-shaking article documenting how and why SARS-2 is indeed a synthetic GoF virus. This report of Montagnier and Perez is typically sternly refuted by mainstream scientists who stand much to lose if indeed GoF were exposed for what it is fully capable of. This mainstream media keeps insisting without a true scientific basis that SARS-2 arose absolutely exclusively through natural evolution. But what the mainstream media is actually doing in ICRM's opinion is misleading, through poor science at best, or by pure propaganda at worst, to an unsuspecting public. Stated more concisely, without hard evidence, by fanciful speculation or inconclusive peer-reviewed reports, or by misleading convoluted evidence by their detractors, Montagnier and Perez are facing an onslaught of criticism from the mainstream media. Both Dr. Martenson and Yuri Deigin separately have eloquently argued in their respective videos above that no reports to date: (A) prove SARS-2 arose via natural evolution, and (B) can disprove SARS-2 is indeed a GoF synthetic virus. See: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/d9e5g - Perez JC, Montagnier L. COVID-19, SARS and Bats Coronavirus Genomes Unexpected Exogenous RNA Sequences. OSFPREPRINTS. 2020 Apr 25. This controversy reminds ICRM of the Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling's early claims (circa 1975) that high-dosages of Vit. C is a potent anticancer agent, but that it took over 30 years to prove to a consensus of mainstream scientists he was correct from the start.

  • Nobel prize-winning scientist Prof Michael Levitt: lockdown is a “huge mistake”

  • Nobel Laureate Professor Levitt reviews the inadequate mathematical formulas being used to calculate the trajectory of the SARS-2 rate of spread and mortality. He relates this inadequate math to the more near-term post-exposure projected/predicted death rates especially in the aged or those suffering from co-morbidities. Professor Levitt also discusses how lockdown practices are likely to sooner or later bring about more mortality than the pandemic otherwise would. Additionally, he discusses the value of face masks over the short and long term. His message also leaves us unmistakably with the ramifications of the SARS-2 as it spreads across the globe. Specifically, there will be inescapable ramifications (A) when the so-called lockdown "exit strategy" is initiated, i.e., there will be a resurgence (restart) of SARS-2 morbidity and mortality rates; (B) secondly, there will be an inescapable ramification as chronic SARS-2 infection relates to future morbidity and mortality rates in aging populations, especially as co-morbidities arise long after initial SARS-2 exposure. ICRM proposes that the SARS-2 pandemic is unlike temporary seasonal influenza infections, rendering such comparisons mute. Meaning that due to the deeply entrenched immunosuppressive aspects to SARS-2 specifically by its ability to infect neural cells, RBCs and WBC's CD147 receptors sites, current peer-review suggests this infection more closely resembles viruses capable of chronically infecting human hosts over the long term, not too dissimilar to herpes zoster and/or HIV. This may be even more probable due to SARS-2 being able to infect common house pets and other animal vectors that may sooner or later cause a recurrence. This inescapably suggests to ICRM that optimizing human immune functions across all age groups, especially the aged, must be a priority for years to come. ICRM's webinar offerings cover solutions to all exit strategies coming out of lockdown.

  • Recommendation Regarding the Use of Cloth Face Coverings, Especially in Areas of Significant Community-Based Transmission

  • This excellent up-to-date research gives us two perspectives we must reconcile: (A) beneficial practices to employ over the short-term as SARS-2 spreads across the globe, as opposed to (B) beneficial practices to employ over the long-term spread of SARS-2 infection as it enters into chronicity. Unfortunately, wearing face masks cannot help the human population best address the long-term, longest-lasting solution, which is to persistently optimize human immune functions via appropriate hygiene, dietary excellence, nutritional supplementation and appropriate physical fitness practices such as daily power walking in the fresh air and sunshine.

  • Some doctors moving away from ventilators for virus patients

  • Microclotting appears to be the most important aspect to the risk of near-term death from SARS-2, which arises from the inflammatory (so-called cytokine) storm. Key laboratory signs such as elevated C-Reactive Protein and D-dimer levels plus aberrant WBC counts are essential for the attending medical team to quickly normalize to prevent sudden death. Nutritional supplements that intervene at the source of the microclotting cascade would include: (1) supplements that effectively lower elevated xanthine oxidase (XO), which is often upregulated by many viral infections, and (2) checking through select nutrients inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and (3) NF-KB. (1-3) are potentially a deadly threesome that together synergizes to produce powerful and abundant pro-oxidants that unfavorably oxidize and overwhelm the glutathione antioxidant enzyme system (e.g., GSHPx). It is not well-recognized that at certain thresholds oxidized GSHPx is a major trigger to sepsis leading to microclotting, which the patient may experience as shortness of breath. If left unchecked, this cascade may eventually lead to sudden death or DIC. ICRM webinars available by clicking our Webinar Library tab, cover these phenomena and the proper drugs and nutriceuticals to prevent or reverse the occurrence of sepsis and microclotting.

 

Immune Optimizing Resources Coming Soon. Stay tuned!

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Instagram

www.ICRMlearn.org

Tel: 407-418-0700

Other ICRM Offerings:

  • CME/CE Courses

  • Seminars and Webinars

  • Preceptorship Training

  • Regenerative Health Coaching Training

 

Stay informed by filling out our Contact Form to receive updates on future events.
 

© 2020 by International Congress of Regenerative Medicine